The Chicago Sun-Times reports on the spanking by a family court judge of
Tea Party freshman Congressman lying tea bagger "family values" hypocrite Joe Walsh, who seems to be more than $100,000 behind in child support...
A Chicago judge issued a preliminary ruling Wednesday against U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh (R-Ill.) in his child-support dispute with his ex-wife, ordering the Tea Party favorite to explain why he appears to be $100,000 behind in child-support payments.
Cook County Circuit Judge Raul Vega also wanted to know why Walsh wasn’t in court Wednesday — the McHenry Republican’s ex-wife, Laura Walsh, was there — and initially said he expected him to show up for the next hearing.
In court, Walsh’s attorney, Janet Boyle, asked Vega “for what purpose” he wanted the congressman in court.
Vega gave her a puzzled look — to which Boyle responded: “Mr. Walsh is a U.S. congressman.”
“Well, he’s no different than anyone else,” the judge replied.
...
She says her ex-husband started making half-payments years ago and then completely stopped sending any money. He claimed he was broke, she said.
But last year, when she saw he had made a $35,000 contribution to his own congressional campaign, she became suspicious about his claims that he had no money. She had her attorney file the motion that Vega granted on Wednesday.
...
Rep. Walsh recently hired Boyle — his fifth lawyer in the case — after attorneys were unable to reach a settlement at a private session a few weeks ago.
Well, SURE he's different, judge nit picker. He's a white male card carrying tea bagger Republican Congressman! Rules are for the little people! DUH! WTF is wrong with you? Since when is lying and hypocrisy illegal? And what kind of name is that, anyway? Vega? Sounds a bit brown for a judge...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy: Anyone can comment. Registration is not required. There is no moderation. We do not censor or remove comments. Your comment should show up immediately.
The only exception is we will remove any comment that identifies, targets, threatens or in any way harasses any private individual.
Comments that include excessive vulgarity, racial slurs, death wishes and WILD ALL CAPS RANTS may be featured.
In recognition of the fact that this is very probably an entirely unworkable policy so vague as to be completely meaningless and therefore ultimately unenforceable, we reserve the right to do whatever the bleep we might bleepity-bleep well feel like doing at any bleeping given time. Please adjust your clocks accordingly.
BTW, "we" is me. If you don't like it, feel free to complain. Make sure you include excessive vulgarity, racial slurs, death wishes and WILD ALL CAPS RANTS.